Frequency of Bacterial Isolation and Resistance Patterns in Canine Skin Samples in Medellín: Retrospective Study 2014-2017

Abstract

Among the most frequent dermatological alterations reported in canines, there are infectious processes, with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius being the most frequently isolated bacterium, and other bacterial agents have also been reported, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas spp., Proteus spp. and E. coli., among others. The present study is of retrospective descriptive nature, in which the values from a bacterial isolation database of a reference laboratory for the city of Medellín, Colombia, were analyzed. Said database was refined for samples related only to cultures of skin, which yielded a quantity of 918 skin samples, of which it was obtained that 63.93% (582/918) were cultured with positive bacterial isolation. Eight antibiotics were evaluated for the analysis of bacterial resistance using the antibiogram, such as amikacin, ampicillin-sulbactam, amoxicillinclavulanic acid, neomycin, doxycycline, azithromycin, trimethoprim sulfa, and cephalexin via sensidisks. Epidemiological variables such as sex, age, and the most commonly affected breeds were evaluated. It was found that males were affected more frequently. Likewise, animals equal to or under five years old presented a more significant amount of skin infections. In turn, it was determined that the most affected breed were mongrel dogs. The bacterium with the highest isolation frequency was Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, presenting a higher percentage of resistance to antibiotics such as doxycycline, azithromycin, and neomycin. In turn, the antibiotic with the lowest presentation of resistance was cephalexin.
PDF (Spanish)

References

Matousek JL, Campbell KL. A comparative review of cutaneous pH: Review article. 2002;13(6): 293-300. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3164.2002.00312.x

Duijkeren EV, Catry B, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pomba MC, Pyorala S, et al. Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2011;66(12): 2705-2714. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr367

Ríos AM, Baquero MR, Ortiz G, Ayllón T, Smit L, Rodríguez M, et al. Staphylococcus multirresistentes a los antibióticos y su importancia en medicina veterinaria. Clin Vet Peq Anim. 2015;35(3): 149-161. Disponible en: https://www.clinvetpeqanim.com/img/pdf/223473834.pdf

Pianta C, de Oliveira S, Bello L, TellesA, da Silva V. Pioderma estafilococócico: identificação das espécies sensibilidade aos antimicrobianos. Rev Cienc Agrovet. 2006;5: 60-63. Disponible en: https://www.revistas.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5382

Ihrke PJ. Infecciones integumentarias - infecciones bacterianas de la piel. En: Greene G, editor. Enfermedades infecciosas en perros y gatos. Cap. 85. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2000. p. 595-602. Disponible en: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20528361.pdf

Cavalcanti S, Coutinho S. Identificação e perfil de sensibilidade antibacteriana de Staphylococcus spp. isolados da pele de cães sadios e com piodermite. Clín Vet. 2005;58: 60-66.

Castellanos I, Rodríguez G, Santos R. Aislamiento e identificación bioquímica de microorganismos bacterianos a partir de infecciones de piel en caninos. Rev Med Vet. 2011;22: 21-30. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rmv/n22/n22a03.pdf

Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method. Ame Jour Clin Path. 1966;36(5): 493-496. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5325707/

Antúnez O, Calle S, Morales S, Falcón N, Pinto C. Frecuencia de patógenos aislados en casos clínicos de dermatitis bacteriana canina y su susceptibilidad antibiótica. Rev Inv Vet Perú. 2009;20(2): 332-338. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/rivep/v20n2/a27v20n2.pdf

Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins RR, Lilenbaum W. Distribución de especies susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de estafilococos aislados de otitis externa canina. Vet Dermatol. 2010;21: 292-296.

Bannoehr J, Guardabassi L. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius en el perro: taxonomía, diagnóstico, ecología, epidemiología y patogenicidad. Vet Dermatol. 2012;23: 253-266. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01046.x

Ruzauskas M, Couto N, Belas A, Klimiene I, Siugzdiniene R, Pomba C. Primer informe de cerdos resistentes a la meticilina. Staphylococcus aureus ST398 en Lituania. Pol J Vet Sci. 2016;16: 125-127. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0002

Feng Y, Tian W, Lin D, Luo Q, Zhou Y, Yang T, Deng Y, Liu YH, Liu JH. Prevalencia y caracterización de meticilina resistente Staphylococcus pseudintermediusen mascotas del sur de China. Vet Microbiol. 2012;160: 517-524.

Garbacz K, Ćarnowska S, Piechowicz L, Haras K. Potencial de patogenicidad de Staphylococcus pseudinter medio cepas aisladas de portadores caninos y de perros con signos de infección. Virulencia. 2013; 4: 255-259. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/viru.23526

Meng S, Burrows A, Coombs G, Khazandi M, Abraham S, Norris J, Weese JS, Trott D. Characterization of meticillin-resistant and meticillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from cases of canine pyoderma in Australia. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2014;63: 1228-1233. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.076117-0

Blondeau J, Shebelski S. Comparative in vitro killing of canine strains of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Escherichia coli by cefovecin, cefazolin, doxycycline and pradofloxacin. Vet Dermatol. 2016;27: 267-e63. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vde.12334

Foster TJ. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2017;41: 430-449. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1 093/femsre/fux007

Zur G, Elad D, Sterenzy A. Increased Resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius to the Commonly Used Antibiotics in Canine Dermatology. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2011;66(4). Disponible en: http://ijvm.org.il/sites/default/files/increased_resistance_of_staphylococcus_pseudintermedius_from_december_book_en.pdf

Hariharan H, Coles M, Poole D, Lund L, Page R. Update on antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from canine and feline otitis externa. Can Vet J. 2006;47: 253–255. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7174948_Update_on_antimicrobial_susceptibilities_of_bacterial_isolates_from_canine_and_feline_otitis_externa

Vanni M, Tognetti R, Pretti C, Crema F, Soldani G, Meucci V. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus intermedius and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolated from dogs. Res Vet Sci. 2009;87(2): 192-195. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.01.011

Toma S, Colombo S, Cornegliani L, Perisco P. Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily cephalexin in canine superficial pyoderma: an open controlled study. J Small Anim. Pract. 2008;49: 384-391. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2008.00585.x

Keywords

canines
cephalexin
bacterial dermatitis
doxycycline
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius antibiotic resistance